[00:46:00] Chalene Johnson : I will say that. He’s gonna make you question who is manipulating who, and there’s so many characters in this documentary, and they just keep peeling away layers and bringing in a new character and/or character development, like better than the best movie. Like, you’re like, I kept thinking to myself, “So this really happened.”
Okay, I want you to look at the timestamp, and if you have not yet seen this movie, you’re gonna need to dip out. And you want to, you want to dip out now and come back and enjoy the rest of the show where we’re gonna talk. ‘Cause listen, I promise you this, after you see it, you’re gonna be like, “I need to talk through this.” Now you have something to look forward to. And if you’ve already seen it, great. Here we go. This is your spoiler alert warning. You have five seconds to leave the room or put this on pause. And here we go. Okay, the crazy stuff, the crazy stuff that people are talking about. Billy Evans, that’s the boyfriend.
[00:47:00] Chalene Johnson : Dude, he is so obviously a narcissistic, controlling, power-hungry, insane… Okay, the nude scene, were you like, “What is going on?” Like, “Oh, hi, just a random penis.” And then how funny was it Nathan’s reaction? But I mean, like, what was that? What was that on behalf of Nathan Fielder, the director? And what was that on behalf of Billy?
Did Billy want that in there? Obviously, obviously. And, like, even his pose, what was that? Okay, I don’t have enough time to even talk about Billy. Oh, wait, did you stay to the very end and read the credits? I’m sure you did. Okay. But how about him, I don’t think he just loves Elizabeth, I think he wants to be Elizabeth. I think he wants to wear an Elizabeth skin suit and be Elizabeth I think that when he met her, he is a liar when he said, “I didn’t know who she was.” Dude, you just head toured her building in Silicon Valley. You live in Silicon Valley. There was nobody more famous other than Elon Musk at the time. Give me a break.
[00:48:00] Chalene Johnson :”Oh, I didn’t know, I didn’t know who she was. She had big glasses on.” Oh, okay. Yeah, her mouth isn’t real recognizable. Give me a break. No, you just lost my credibility. You lost all credibility there in the first interview with Nathan. And then I kept thinking to myself, and obviously Nathan was too, Nathan was asking our questions. Like, “So, what do you see in her?” Like, you get a lot of women. Obviously you’re a good-looking dude. You have a nice body, and here’s this woman who’s absolutely bankrupt and going to federal prison, and you’re like, “Give me some of that?” And he’s like, “I just fell in love with her at first sight.” Mm-mm. No, this is a power-hungry weirdo, in my opinion.
These are all just for entertainment purposes only. These are not facts. These are my opinions. Okay. Then who else are we gonna talk about? Elizabeth. So I watched the movie where Amanda, is it Seyfried? Is that how you say her name? Seyfried, Seyfried. I forget. I know they said it wrong in the movie. But anyways, I watched the movie about Elizabeth, which was done so well, and the documentaries.
[00:49:00] Chalene Johnson : And in the documentaries Elizabeth is so powerful, so commanding. You’d have to be to talk these billionaires into giving you billions of dollars, and to convince millions of people. Like, you have to be a powerhouse. You have to be a manipula- I mean, you have to be something. And in this movie, right, didn’t you think she just seemed like so broken and fragile? And at first I thought, tell me if you thought the same thing, when Nathan was interviewing her and the tears were welling up in her eyes, my very first thought was, acting. Oh, she’s, she’s learned how to cry on demand. That was my very first thought. And I thought, this is a performance for him. This is her way of making everybody feel very sorry for her.
[00:50:00] Chalene Johnson : She probably got pregnant to make, to change the narrative. It’s the only way that she could, ’cause this woman’s gonna do it again. And so the only way that she could really win over the public’s sentiment is using the mother card. And then to pull in this documentarian to show this human side of her, and she’s prepared.
And so I thought she was playing this role, but she never did break character. She was a broken bird from the very beginning. You could just tell. That’s just like a, a broken wanting to be controlled kind of woman, or is that just how she is with men? ‘Cause remember, Sunny, the guy that she started Theranos with, was I think like 20 some-odd years older than her, and allegedly, like, really abusive, really controlling. And people have said, like, he was the puppet master, and she just did everything he said God, and then what about the scene where the dad’s like, “And then there was Elizabeth’s rape,” and then they just dropped it. I don’t remember that part of the story, so I’ve gotta look that up. But, like, that was so weird.
[00:51:00] Chalene Johnson : They just, like, threw that out there and then dropped it off. And the parents, oh, I wanted more time with the parents, and the parents are scared of Billy, too. Why is everybody afraid of Billy? I’m afraid of Billy. I mean, Billy, please don’t come after me. But Elizabeth just broken and controlled. And so I guess, can you be a manipulating, lying narcissist yourself, but fall prey to someone, and then you slip into a different role?
I’m really curious about that. Thoughts? I mean, does she actually believe she’s innocent? What do you think? Hmm.
[00:52:00] Chalene Johnson : That I don’t have a clear answer. What do you think? Does Elizabeth Holmes thinks, does she think she is guilty? I think in kind of the same way OJ had convinced himself he didn’t do anything wrong, and he convinced himself, and I think Elizabeth has convinced herself.
I do. Now let’s talk about the who’s on first conversation, because that has been with me all day today. We saw the movie last night, and that, to me, 24 hours later, has a much bigger impact than when I watched it. First of all, that he chose that clip to explain or to try to help Elizabeth understand her style of communication was brilliant.
Because that is exactly how Elizabeth communicates, and that form of communication, in my opinion, feels very narcissistic. It’s when someone is not trying to help you understand something. They’re trying to hold onto their position by playing with words, by playing with definitions. That’s what that comedy routine is all about.
[00:53:00] Chalene Johnson : The point isn’t that she was like, “Oh, I’m literal.” No, that’s not the point. The point is that every time anyone has a conversation with you, you return to your definitions, and y- the words you’re using are meant to confuse people, and you just keep returning to these same words so that people’s questions go unanswered.
It’s a technique. It’s a way of, like, protecting their stance. It’s a way of protecting themselves so they don’t have to say, “Oh, I’m wrong.” She doesn’t have to say, “I lied,” because it’s like the Bill Clinton, “I was not having a relation with that woman,” or whatever his words were. It’s semantics so that they can profess to themselves and others, “I’ve never lied based on my definition of the words.” And that was the other thing. She said she never lied in her entire life. Like, what are you even… Like, that in and of itself is a lie. And then she’s like, “Well, I mean, in the way that you’ve defined it.” So there’s a whole lot of, like, how we’re defining language, and that’s self-protective. That is how she evades the truth.
[00:54:00] Chalene Johnson : It’s, she just confuses people so that she never has to give a clear answer, and then therefore she never has to be accountable. And you know, there’s that, and then she’s obviously on the spectrum. That’s clear that she doesn’t have a sense of self. It doesn’t seem like it. Or at least, again, is she playing a character?
That’s another… They kept talking about that. I’m like, it does feel like she’s playing a character, whether she ever said it or not, who cares? Who cares? Who cares whether she said it or not? It’s very clear that’s what she’s been doing And now is she playing a character in this documentary? I felt like she was. Like this broken, frizzy hair, giant blue … Like why are those eyes so freaking blue? Did he have some kind of filter on them? I feel like that was intentional. There had to have been some kind of filter on those eyes to make us feel some kind of way, because she played the broken, innocent victim breastfeeding mother to a T.
[00:55:00] Chalene Johnson : It really did feel like, okay, you’re really playing this mother card, aren’t ya? I don’t know, but like she’s also a mother, so is she playing a mother card? Is she playing a role? Does she even know who she is? Does she have a sense of self? And I’m not saying because she didn’t get the joke that that is why she’s unaware or neurodivergent.
I’m just saying like I just think she’s unaware in general. Like anyone who stares at you that long, I am so uncomfortable. And the head shaking, that felt like a, like early Parkinson’s or something. What is that? Does anyone know? That’s very strange that, that like just staring and the, the, the head nodding, like that’s so weird.
That’s a, gotta be a neurological thing. Okay. I haven’t heard anybody talk about this, but it’s something I picked up on and I’m wondering if you picked up on it.
[00:56:00] Chalene Johnson : I feel like Nathan, the director, was trying to plant a seed from one of the very first scenes, and I think this was very intentional on Nathan’s part, and that is he was trying to get the viewer to believe or to question whether there was some type of attraction between Nathan and Elizabeth.
If that weren’t the case … And well, let me give you some evidence of it. So number one, he kept in scenes like he said, “How do you flirt?” She said, “Oh, I just hold a stare.” And then she just held a stare with him for a really long time. And she, he’s like, “Oh, like this?” I mean, so there was that, and that was like right away early.
And then there were just a few other scenes where it was like very … He kept the scenes in. You know, like her asking him to go swimming, and then how intentional it was he played that at the end of the movie, the two of them like frolicking in the water together. The way he talked about her hug with him. The way he wrote his letter to her, and the things he said when they were on the phone together, like, “I miss you. It’s so good to hear your voice.” That’s not, that’s not something a journalist says. That is not something a journalist says, or a lawyer or, you know, anyone in a profession.
[00:57:00] Chalene Johnson : And then also when Amanda was introduced, right? And then Amanda was asking him, like, “Are you trying to protect her? You care about her And there are a few other things that, yeah, so obviously that was intentional. Don’t even question it. Nathan is a director. He kept that in there as a layer so that you would be thinking about this movie two weeks later.
That was a layer. The layer of, I mean, God, there were just so many layers to this thing. And just, okay, do you think Elizabeth knew that Billy had negotiated his own rate for the documentary? I don’t think she did, but did she know that there was gonna be a private conversation and he didn’t want her in the room?
[00:58:00] Chalene Johnson : Yes, I do think so, but I don’t think she knew if it was about money, ’cause I, I feel like that scene felt honest when she was like, “Well, I’m not making any money from this.” If you stayed all the way to the end and saw the credits, you saw that Billy did give up his rights to earn money on this movie, which I did find very fascinating.
I should have prepared before I recorded, but I, I’m curious if in doing so, did he also have to give up any executive producer rights where he didn’t have the ab- I, I’m sure he didn’t have the ability to screen this before it came out. The most fascinating piece about this documentary is it is about being manipulated.
Clearly, in my opinion, Billy is using Elizabeth because he’s power hungry and wants to be Elizabeth, and it’s just so exploitive. I just can’t even believe it. He’s a manipulator. The movie’s about manipulation.
[00:59:00] Chalene Johnson : Even Amanda, there were things that, uh, like I, I love her, I love her little personality, but there are parts in the way Nathan asked her questions where she kind of, like, didn’t have a good answer.
You know what I mean? And then were we being manipulated by Elizabeth? Were we be- being manipulated by Amanda? Were we, we being manipulated by Nathan? So here we are watching this documentary about manipulation, and what is the truth and what is real? We have to ask those same questions even about the filmmaker.
Ooh, it was good. It was good. I know you’ve already seen it or you wouldn’t have made it to this part of the episode, but I need to know, please, I hope you took notes, because we need to discuss each and every one of these points, and I bet there’s some points that I missed, so drop them in the comments.
All right. I love you. Thanks for listening, and I’ll talk to you soon.